Legal Opinion

Fenno v. Primrose

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 7, 1903No. 429PublishedCited by 23 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

The questions presented in this case are of exceeding interest and of great practical importance to the profession -and to litigants, and they have been discussed upon both sides with notable ability and commendable thoroughness. They relate—First, to the power of a federal court to appoint an auditor in an action at law, where the parties are entitled, under the constitution, to a jury trial; and, second, to the power of such a court to regulate the compensation of the auditor, and to determine where the burden of such compensation shall rest.

There is no federal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Whipple v. Cumberland Cotton Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1844
  3. Hershberger v. BlewettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1892
  4. American Bell Tel. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1895
  5. Davis v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Casualty Co. v. FechheimerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  2. State Ex Rel. Romsa v. County ClerkWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  3. United States v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1916
  4. Graffis v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  5. United States v. WellsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API