Legal Opinion

The Walter Adams

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided March 9, 1921No. 1359PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by the Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Company against the fishing steamer Walter Adams. On libelant’s objection to clerk’s taxation of costs. Overruled.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

The libelant objects to the clerk’s taxation as costs of an item of $120 paid for premiums on appeal bonds. These were required by rule 13 of the Circuit Court of Appeals (150 Fed. xxxix, 79 C. C. A. xxxix). The claimant, who prevailed upon appeal, was put to this expense in order to comply with a rule of court. The Gov. Ames, 187 Fed. 40, 48, 49, 109 C. C. A. 94, and The Reliance (D. C.) 189 Fed. 416, related to premiums on bonds given to release a vessel, and may be thus distinguished from the present case.

The question of the allowance of costs in the federal courts…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. The VolundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  3. The EuropeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  4. Smith v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1910
  5. Fenno v. PrimroseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crowe v. Peaslee-Gaulbert Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
  2. Lunn v. F. W. Woolworth Co. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. LunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API