Legal Opinion

State v. Fox

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 2014No. 10040604; A148110PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHUMAN, S. J.

Defendant appeals two of his convictions for sex-crimes he committed while he was a recruiter for the Oregon Army National Guard.1 One of his convictions was for attempted first-degree sexual abuse under ORS 163.427 (l)(a)(B), which applies only when the perpetrator uses “forcible compulsion.” On appeal, defendant argues that, on the undisputed facts, the state did not prove that element. Another conviction was for coercion under ORS 163.275(l)(g), which applies only when a “public servant” unlawfully coerces a victim. Defendant contends that, as used in that statute, the term…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Holcomb v. SunderlandOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. WaltersOregon Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dowell v. Oregon Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Bialostosky v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 75, Local 2043 v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API