Legal Opinion

Eric Daly v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and RJ Reynolds

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 2015No. 14-AA-910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:

Petitioner Eric Daly challenges the Compensation Review Board’s (“CRB”) decision affirming the denial of his request for a twenty-percent penalty to be levied on intervenors RJ Reynolds and ACE ESIS, Inc. (“ACE”), the employer and insurer, respectively. Daly claims that a penalty is warranted because intervenors failed to pay him the amount owed within ten days after it became due as required by the District of Columbia Workers’ Compensation Act (“Workers’ Compensation Act” or “Act”). See D.C.Code § 32-1515(f) (2012 Repl.) (“If any compensation ... is not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oparaugo v. WattsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. District of Columbia v. PlaceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Reyes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Ronda Nunnally v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Darius Briscoe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. D.C. Department of Health v. D.C. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Darius Briscoe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Darius Briscoe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Hensley v. D.C. Dep't of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API