Legal Opinion

Darius Briscoe v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2018No. 15-CF-1369Published

1ConcurrenceMcLeese, Associate Judge

I join the opinion of the court in its entirety. I write separately to briefly address the dissent's contention that the division in this case is bound by an earlier holding in Green v. United States , 974 A.2d 248 (D.C. 2009). The opinion for the court concludes to the contrary that the court in Green simply accepted a concession without ruling on the correctness of that concession. Ante at 657-58. In large part, the dissent's contrary interpretation of Green rests on the contention that "[p]arties do not, by agreement or concession, relieve the court of its responsibility to decide…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API