Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Place
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 2006No. 04-TX-968PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Chief Judge:
The District of Columbia (“government”) appeals the decision of the Superior Court lowering the supplemental assessment of commercial real property owned by appellee Edison Place, LLC (“Edison Place”) by $11,193,000. The trial court held that as a matter of law, the District of Columbia could not include an increase in land value in a supplemental assessment because such changes to land valuation can only occur via a scheduled general assessment. The reduction of $11,193,000 represents the portion of the'increase identified in the assessment as the increased value of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Harrison v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AND RAND SIMBERG v. MICHAEL E. MANN, NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. MICHAEL E. MANNDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hood v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Chase Plaza Condominium Association, Inc. and Darcy, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Perez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.