Legal Opinion

Darius Briscoe v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2018No. 15-CF-1369PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurring opinion by Associate Judge McLeese at page 665.

Separate Statement by Associate Judge Thompson at page 666.

Opinion by Senior Judge Ruiz dissenting in part at page 667.

Thompson, Associate Judge:

A jury convicted appellant Darius Briscoe of armed robbery, assault with a dangerous weapon ("ADW"), and two counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence ("PFCV"). Appellant asserts that the government violated Superior Court Criminal Procedure Rule 16 and his rights under Brady v. Maryland1 by failing to obtain and produce the contents of a surveillance camera attached to an…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. District Hospital Partners, LP v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Fleming v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Hawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
  5. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API