Legal Opinion

AP Woodson Company v. Sakran

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1957No. 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

Appellee sued to recover for damage to his home,' consisting of the freezing and bursting of the heating radiators and pipes and other incidental damage to the walls, ceilings and floors, allegedly caused by the failure of’ th'e home’s oil-burning heating system to function due in turn to appellant’s failure to deliver fuel oil pursuant to a contract between the parties.

Appellant had furnished oil and repair service for appellee’s oil burner for a number of years, dealing with either appellee or his tenant. According to the testimony of the appellee, when a tenant moved out…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nolan v. WerthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. Pfeffer v. ErnstDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Taylor v. JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bay General Industries, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Sears, Roebuck and Company v. GoudieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. MiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Cullinane v. Potomac Electric Power CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Sovereign Chemical & Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Ameropan Oil Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API