Legal Opinion

Mergen v. Salina Northern Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1919No. 22,171PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Mitchell district court; Richard M. Pickler, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiffs sued to recover for materials and provisions sold and delivered to Burton and Carter, who were alleged to have been engaged and employed in the construction of certain sections of the principal defendant’s railroad as con*812tractors, the railroad company not having taken any bond from them to protect materialmen as provided by statute.

To the original petition a demurrer and motions to make definite and' certain were filed and sustained. The plaintiffs filed an amended petition, and motions to make this pleading definite and certain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. BalderstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Lapere v. LuckeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Balmer v. LongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Wilhite v. DieballSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sluss v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Lofland v. CromanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. State Highway Commission v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Mead v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Downey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API