Legal Opinion

Wilhite v. Dieball

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1915No. 19,204PublishedCited by 3 opinions

, Appeal from Pawnee district court; Albert S. Foulks, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. The plaintiff formerly owned the property which consists of a hotel at Garfield, and he traded it to a man by the name of Mason for a farm in Missouri. Mason and wife gave him a mortgage on the hotel *79property to secure a note for $1000, and on the same day that the mortgage was executed they conveyed the property to defendant William Dieball, the deed reciting that the conveyance was subject to a “first mortgage for $1000 dated today and due in two years from date, in favor of John Wilhite, drawing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. BalderstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Martin v. AtchisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1890
  3. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gustin v. CarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Mergen v. Salina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Wilhite v. MasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API