Legal Opinion

Balmer v. Long

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1919No. 21,980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Rooks district court; Charles I. Sparks, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff bought of the defendants a stock of goods including “all book accounts now on books, and all notes, at one hundred cents on the dollar.” Upon coming into possession he found that several hundred dollars’ worth of the accounts were barred by the statute of limitations when purchased by him, and brought this action to recover the amount thereof. He alleged that as an inducement to sign the contract the defendants stated that $150 to $200 might be slow to collect, but all of them were good, and if not paid he could “come back on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Taggart v. AddisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Bowersox v. J. W. Hall & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Upham v. HeadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. GannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Downey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Criswell v. Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Mergen v. Salina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. McCroskey v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Jerald v. HoustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API