Legal Opinion

Bendix Corporation v. Stagg

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 13, 1984PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILLY, Justice:

This interlocutory appeal is from the Superior Court’s denial of defendant Bendix’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 Defendant contends that plaintiff’s product liability claim is barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations 10 Del.C. § 8119. 2 The issue before this Court is whether the discovery rule we enunciated in Layton v. Allen, Del.Supr., 246 A.2d 794 (1968) is applicable in a product liability action involving latent diseases. The Superior Court answered in the affirmative. Stagg v. Bendix, Del.Super., 472 A.2d 40 (1984). We agree and hereby Affirm.

I

This product…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  3. Isaacson, Stolper & Co. v. Artisan's Savings BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
  5. Dunn v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API