Legal Opinion

Dunn v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 27, 1979PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUILLEN, Justice:

The motion of Defendant St. Francis Hospital, Inc. for summary judgment was granted by the Superior Court on the ground that the action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The. plaintiff’s appeal in this medical malpractice case presents the question of whether the statute of limitations commenced to run when the negligent act or omission was committed or when the harm first manifested itself to the patient. The plaintiff also contends that if the Court finds that the statute begins to run at the time of the negligent act, then the statute is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  3. Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Landgraff v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Owen v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Hershberger v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Ewing v. BeckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. Alicea v. Córdova IturreguiSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API