Legal Opinion
C. O. Falter, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1974PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas Aloi, J.
This is a motion made pursuant .to CPLR 3212 by plaintiff C. 0. Falter, Inc., as insured fo,r a declaratory judgment against defendant North River Insurance Co., as insurers, for the purpose of determining that the general liability insurance policy issued by the defendant insurance company afforded coverage for ithe counterclaims asserted by Congel-Reuter, Inc. The defendant has cross-moved for summary judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3212 in opposition to plaintiff’s motion. It is conceded that neither Crum & Forster Insurance Companies nor United States Fire Insurance Company has any obligations…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Uppington v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Moore v. Charles T. Wills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Floralbell Amusement Corp. v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kelley-Coppedge, Inc. v. Highlands Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Dorchester Development Corp. v. Safeco Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Knutson Construction Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Sucrest Corp. v. Fisher Governor Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.