State ex rel. Taxpayers Coalition v. City of Lakewood
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Relators assert that they are entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel respondents to provide the requested records. More specifically, relators claim that (1) they never received mailing lists, notes related to Finance Director Ittu’s September 14, 1998 presentation, notes prepared by Executive Assistant Dunn, and Social Security numbers and deferred compensation contributions on water department employee W-2 forms; (2) they received redacted W-2 forms, 1998 financial statements, and Mayor Cain’s and Ittu’s September 14 presentations from respondents before they filed this action, but that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. BSW Development Group v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Nix v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Scanlon v. DetersOhio Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State Ex Rel. American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State ex rel. Calvary v. City of Upper ArlingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Carr v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Griffin v. Sehlmeyer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State ex rel. Lanham v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.