Legal Opinion
Schaeffler Group USA, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 17, 2012No. Consol. 06-00432PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Judge:
Plaintiff brought five cases 1 challenging the constitutionality of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA” or “Byrd Amendment”). 2 These cases were consolidated by order of the Court under Consol. Ct. No. 06-00432. (Order (Feb. 15, 2011), ECF No. 37.) Plaintiff claims that it unlawfully was denied affected domestic producer (“ADP”) status, which would have qualified it to receive distributions under the CDSOA. The consolidated case is now before the Court on dispositive motions. Defendants United States Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jodelle Kirk v. Schaeffler Group USACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Schaeffler Group USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Ethan Allen Global, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Standard Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.