Legal Opinion
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. White Consolidated Industries Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 24, 1999No. 91-1630PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CINDRICH, District Judge.
This action arises from the financial collapse of several pension plans (the “BK Plans”) which were at all times covered by Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. Section 1301 et seq. Plaintiff, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”), the statutory guarantor of the BK Plans, filed a five count amended complaint against defendant White Consolidated Industries, Inc. (“WCI”) seeking to recover unfunded benefit liabilities pursuant to various applications of 29 U.S.C. Sections 1362 and 1369. WCI…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lind v. Jones, Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Paslowski v. Standard Mortg. Corp. of GeorgiaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Burstein v. Retirement Account Plan for Employees of Allegheny Health Education & Research FoundationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage v. Sucesión de Rivera- SerranoTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2005
- Gilfillan v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025