Legal Opinion

Gilfillan v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 17, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-1411Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRANCES S. GILFILLAN, Plaintiff, v. No. 25-cv-1411 (TSC) PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORP., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Frances S. Gilfillan, proceeding pro se, alleges that Defendant Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) (1) wrongfully denied her surviving spousal benefits under her late husband’s pension plan, and (2) provided misleading information about her coverage prior to his death. Third Amended Complaint at 1–6, ECF No. 34 (“Am. Compl.”). Plaintiff initially brought this case in the Eastern District of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API