Legal Opinion

Hochgertel v. Canada Dry Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1963No. Appeal, 53PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Eagen,

The plaintiff, a bartender on duty in the clubhouse quarters of a fraternal organization, was injured by flying glass fragments, when an unopened bottle of carbonated soda water exploded as it was standing on the counter behind the bar. The soda water was previously bottled, sold and delivered by the defendant to plaintiff’s employer. The plaintiff sued the defendant bottler manufacturer in assumpsit, charging a breach of implied warranties, namely: (1) That the soda water was of merchantable quality; (2) That it was fit and safe for the purposes for which it was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fox v. SwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Loch v. ConfairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Altieri v. Allentown Officers' & Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Catani v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Nock v. Coca Cola Bot. Wks. Pgh.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Salvador v. Atlantic Steel Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Martin v. SoblotneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Dyson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API