Legal Opinion

Espeland v. OneWest Bank, FSB

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2014No. 6885 S-14571/S-14931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2005 Max and Peggy Espeland refinanced their home with E-Loan, Inc. Shortly thereafter, their loan was purchased by another bank and securitized. The Espelands eventually defaulted on the loan and their home was sold in a non-judicial deed of trust foreclosure. The Espelands brought an action in the superior court to void the sale, arguing mainly that inconsistencies in and multiple transfers of the loan and security documents caused defects in the chain of title. The superior court disagreed and granted summary judgment against the Espelands. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. US Bank National Association v. IbanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hymes v. DeRamusAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Kelly v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DeVilbiss v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Jeffery A. Wendt v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Alexandra Werba v. Association of Village Council PresidentsAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Erkins v. Alaska Trustee, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Alaska Trustee, LLC v. AmbridgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API