Legal Opinion
DiMaggio v. United States Postal Service
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 28, 1984No. Civ. H-83-455PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CLARIE, Senior District Judge.
The federal defendants have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., for partial dismissal, or, in the alternative under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for partial summary judgment. The action arises out of a series of alleged adverse personnel actions against the plaintiff Olga DiMaggio by certain supervisory employees at the Niantic, Connecticut Post Office. The plaintiff asserts causes of action including sex and handicap discrimination, sexual; harassment…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NovotnySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mary Ann Carter RENNIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H. Lawrence GARRETT III, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Rochon v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Baird v. HaithDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1988
- James v. FrankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Ziemba v. SlaterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.