Matthiesen v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action to recover the reasonable value of legal services. The services were rendered by plaintiff’s assignors, McKinstry, Haber & Coombes, practicing attorneys in San Francisco, in bringing suit and collecting in full both principal and interest on six promissory 'notes in the amount of $171,358.08, the payment of which had been refused by the maker on demand of the payee for whom plaintiff’s assignors instituted suit. The case was tried before a jury which awarded plaintiff the sum of $12,500, inclusive of court costs of $74.83 which had been paid by defendant on demand, leaving a balance of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- McCollum v. BarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Grass v. Rindge Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Reardon v. Richmond Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Stuart v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. ErsoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Waller v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Crevolin v. CrevolinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Ries v. ReinardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.