Choi v. AEP Energy Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Appellants Paul Choi, David Fuller, and Stewart Rosman (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of their former employer, AEP Energy Services, Inc. (“AEP”).
Appellants were offered contracts of employment that were memorialized in letters from AEP. The letters stated, “you will also be eligible to participate in the AEP Energy Services, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan.” Appellants contend that this Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) was not part of their employment contracts with AEP because (1) reference to the Plan in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ullmann v. MayOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Neiss v. EhlersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Prestige Homes Real Estate Co. v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Holderman v. Huntington Leasing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Metz v. American Electric Power Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Metz v. American Elec. Power Co., Inc., 06ap-1161 (6-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Metz v. American Elec. Power Co., Inc., 06ap-1161 (6-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Metz v. American Electric Power Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007