Legal Opinion

Holderman v. Huntington Leasing Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1984No. 83AP-1125PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormac, P.J.

Mark Holderman, plaintiff-appellant, filed a complaint in the Franklin County Municipal Court against the Huntington Leasing Company (“Huntington”), defendant-appellee, alleging that Huntington hired him to solicit and obtain leasing business at an annual salary at $22,000 plus bonus. Holderman alleged that the written bonus in effect provided for a maximum bonus of sixty percent of his salary amounting to $13,200, which he .earned, but that Huntington breached its contract by failing to pay him $9,761 of the bonus due, for which he sought judgment.

Huntington answered admitting that it hired…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joe R. Hainline v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  2. Oiler v. Dayton Reliable Tool & Mfg. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anders v. Specialty Chemical Resources, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Four Howards, Ltd. v. J & F Wenz Road Investment, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Terrell v. Uniscribe Professional Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  4. Keller & Kehoe, L.L.P. v. Smart Media of Delaware, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Choi v. AEP Energy Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API