Miller v. Astleford Equipment Co., Inc.

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

The appellant insurance companies paid basic economic loss benefits to Henry Miller for injuries he sustained due to the negligence of Astleford Equipment Co. When Miller brought an action against As-tleford, the appellants intervened to protect their potential subrogation interest. Miller settled with Astleford before trial. The trial court denied recovery to the appellants on the ground that they had not shown that Miller had received duplicate benefits, as required by Minn.Stat. § 65B.53, subd. 3 (1984). They appeal, and we affirm.

FACTS

The parties stipulated to the…