Legal Opinion

Liberato v. Royer & Herr

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1923No. Appeal, 30PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.

The plaintiffs are the father and mother of Griiseppi Liberato, who while employed by the defendants was, on February 9, 1916, killed in the course of his employment, he died unmarried and without issue. The plaintiffs filed with the Workmen’s Compensation Board a petition for compensation under the provisions of the Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736. The Compensation Board refused compensation on the ground that claimants were aliens, residents of Italy, and never have resided in the United States. The board based this conclusion upon section 310 of the Compensation Act…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ware v. HyltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
  2. Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ZebeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  4. Maiorano v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Maiorano v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ford v. A. E. Dick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. McIntyre v. E. J. Lavino & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Persing v. Citizens Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Burke v. Duquesne Light Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Polk v. Western Bedding Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API