Legal Opinion

Ritchey v. Jones

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 16, 1923No. 2 Div. 812PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The grounds upon which the contestant relies to defeat the probate of the will are: (1) That the will was not executed by the testator in accordance with legal requirements. (2) The testator was non compos mentis at the time of its execution. (3) Its execution was the result of undue influence exercised upon the mind of the testator by the proponent, John M. Jones, who is a beneficiary under the will.

The statute requires that the testator’s signature shall be attested “by at least two witnesses, who must subscribe their names thereto in the presence of the testator.” Code, § 6172. It'is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burney v. TorreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Councill v. MayhewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Wear v. WearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Will of Hull v. HullSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Gilbert v. . KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Little v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Massey v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Mindler v. CrockerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Barksdale v. PendergrassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. In Re Cummings' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API