Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. . Knox

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1873PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

That the testator, when he subscribed the will, understood the character of the instrument is conclusively established by the evidence.

There was an interval of ten years between the execution of the will and the last codicil. The will and codicils were drawn by John F. Colin, under the direction of the testator, and he attended at the house of the draughtsman and there executed them in presence of the subscribing witnesses.

The testator took possession of the will and codicils immediately after their execution, and retained them until his death.

It is equally clear that the subscribing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peck v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Remsen v. BrinckerhoffNew York Supreme Court · 1841
  3. Coffin v. . CoffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Baskin v. . BaskinNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Brinckerhoof v. RemsenNew York Court of Chancery · 1840

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Will of Hull v. HullSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. In Re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of TurellNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Bundy v. McKnightIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Ames v. AmesOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Hill v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API