Legal Opinion

Massey v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1925No. 6 Div. 259PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

Robert F. Massey and W. B. Baker, as executors of the will, or instrument purporting to be the will, of Isham Eastis, deceased, filed a petition under the statute to have it duly probated as his last will and testament in the probate court of Jefferson county, where decedent resided at his death. Mary Reynolds, a sister and heir of decedent, and others, objected to and contested in writing the probate of the will on the ground (1) it was not duly executed according to law (2) that said decedent was of unsound mind at the time of its execution ; and (3) its execution was procured through undue…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barnewall v. MurrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Stevens v. LeonardIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Allen v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Woodruff v. HundleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Barksdale v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Little v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Reynolds v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Camp v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Moore v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Gardner v. BalboniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API