Legal Opinion
State v. Anaya
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1966No. 8069PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOE W. WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.
A jury found defendant guilty of violating § 54-7-14, N.M.S.A.1953. He was sentenced to a term in the state penitentiary and was fined. At the trial he was not represented by an attorney. His appeal raises two issues: (1) that he was not permitted to show his'-indigency and (2) that the trial court erred in'failing to "appoint counsel to' represent, him.
- Defendant was arraigned on April 17, ‘1964. The district judge presiding at his arraignment inquired into defendant’s ability to hire a- lawyer and ruled that he could hire a lawyer if he wanted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glenn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Schmidt v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Keur v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- State ex rel. Barth v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. BuelowCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- State v. DeatsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. AcunaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WatchmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Barela v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.