Legal Opinion

State v. Watchman

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1991No. 12212PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

This case raises the question of whether defendant’s prior uncounseled tribal court convictions together with an uncounseled municipal court conviction may properly be utilized as a basis for imposing an aggravated sentence upon defendant following his subsequent felony conviction.

Defendant appeals from the sentences imposed following his entry of guilty pleas to two counts of vehicular homicide. We (1) answer several issues summarily; and discuss: (2) whether the trial court erred in relying upon defendant’s prior uncounseled court convictions as a basis for imposing…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. WoodruffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. FellhauerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. HosteenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. ClahNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API