Legal Opinion

State v. Buelow

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 26, 1984No. 84-530-CR, 84-531-CRPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

The defendants, Ralph and Carol Bue-low, appeal their judgments of conviction of being parties to the crime of arson. The Buelows claim they were denied their right to counsel because of the trial court’s finding that they were not indigent and could not have public defender representation. The Buelows assert that it is the public defender and/or the prosecution who carries the burden of establishing nonindigency and that the evidence introduced was insufficient to establish non- indigency. We disagree. The burden of proof to establish indigency is on the defendant who seeks appointed…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. State v. LenarchickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. United States v. John L. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. SorensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ralph Buelow v. Walter Dickey, Carol Buelow v. Walter DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Jeffrey C. Denny v. Donald GudmansonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Blackhawk Production Credit Ass'n v. Chicago Title InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API