Legal Opinion
Arocho v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 16, 2012No. 12-1328UnpublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
MARY BECK BRISCOE, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is, therefore, submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff-Appellant Norberto Perez Aro-cho, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, appeals dismissal of his complaint asserting a claim for damages pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Olsen v. MapesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Ehrenhaus v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Mobley v. McCormickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Arica Smith v. Trans Union, LLC; Equifax Information Services, LLC; and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
- Cody v. Alcon Vision LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- Downing v. FredetteDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023
- Folsom v. BerryDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
- Folsom v. Internal Revenue ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.