Legal Opinion
Olsen v. Mapes
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 26, 2003No. 02-2226PublishedCited by 1,381 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Tom and Naomi Olsen (“Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, brought this action in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico against attorney Robert Babcock and Administrative Law Judge Paul Mapes. In a Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs also attempted to add the New Mexico Board of Pharmacy (“Board”) as a defendant.
On October 16, 2002, the district court entered its Amended Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, disposing of all of Plaintiffs’ claims. With respect to Defendant Babcock, the court found that it had no personal jurisdiction. With…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Puett v. BlandfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sammie G. Byrd v. Michael P.W. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Eric David Boudette v. John Barnette, Police Officer James Vaughn, Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Young v. QuinlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,381 opinions
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Davis v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Rogers v. Andrus Transportation ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Gustafson v. LukeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
1,376 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.