Legal Opinion

Mobley v. McCormick

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1994No. 94-1278PublishedCited by 394 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.RApp.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Terry Mobley, a pro se litigant, appeals the decision of the district court dismissing his race discrimination lawsuit. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we reverse and remand.

Mr. Mobley initially filed a lawsuit in Colorado State Court complaining of various…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Williams v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by394 opinions

  1. Lee v. Max Intern., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Mobley v. MccormickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. ECCLESIASTES 9: 10-11-12, INC. v. LMC Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. In Re Ferro Corp. Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Olcott v. Delaware Flood Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

389 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API