Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Mendoza
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
TIREY, Justice.
This is a negligence case. Plaintiff grounded the action under the provisions of Section 51 et seq., of 45 U.S.C.A., (Federal Employers’ Liability Act) and the amendments thereto. Defendant entered a general denial and by trial amendment specially plead that plaintiff was negligent and that such negligence was a proximate cause of his injuries, in that plaintiff failed to get in a proper position before attempting to raise the brake shoe and lift it off of the rail, and that such negligence was the sole proximate cause of his injuries. In the alternative, defendant alleged that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daugherty v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Law Offices of James R. Bass, Inc. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- MISSOURI-PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. WillinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- City of Center v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Minsky v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962