Legal Opinion
Ceco Concrete Construction v. J.T. Schrimsher Construction Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided June 2, 1992No. 1:92-cr-00140PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOYE, District Judge.
In these consolidated cases Ceco Concrete Construction Company seeks to have an arbitration award confirmed; Schrimsher Construction Company seeks to have it vacated.
It is conceded that the arbitration under the construction contract rules of the American Arbitration Society involved a dispute relating to a construction contract involving interstate commerce within the meaning of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. section 1 et seq (Brief of J.T. Schrimsher Construction Company, Inc., in support of its motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint and application for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dale S. COENEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. W. PRESSPRICH & CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Stirling Homex Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Metro Industrial Painting Corp. v. Terminal Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Fairchild & Co. v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ebasco Constructors, Inc. v. Ahtna, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Lomax v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance SocietyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002