Legal Opinion
Dale S. COENEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. W. PRESSPRICH & CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Stirling Homex Corporation, Defendant
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 12, 1972No. 153, Docket 71-1714PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEDINA, Circuit Judge:
The question raised by this appeal is the applicability of the arbitration clause contained in the New York Stock Exchange Constitution to a claim which: (1) arose before the plaintiff joined the Stock Exchange; (2) alleges violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (3) alleges violation of the Sherman and Clayton Acts. For the reasons that follow we hold that such a claim is subject to arbitration.
In 1968, while a director of Stirling Homex Corporation, Dale S. Coenen purchased 90,000 shares of Stirling Homex stock for investment purposes. The stock…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Robert Lawrence Co. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,406 R. Stockton Rush, III v. Oppenheimer & Co., and Scott SeskisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.