Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Strong

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1902No. S. F. No. 2267PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; George H. Bahrs, Judge; Action by G. W. Williamson and others against T. E. Strong and others. From-a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

This is a suit to recover the possession of the personal -property described in the complaint, or its value. The complaint is in the ordinary form, and alleges, besides the title of the plaintiff, the value of the property, the taking by the defendant, and other matters, “that said defendants still unlawfully and wrongfully withhold and retain said goods and chattels from the possession of the plaintiff,” etc. The answer, besides denying the allegations of the complaint, alleges “that the defendants have no possession of any -part of said property, and that at the time of the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Marchant v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hawes v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Wren v. ManganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burg v. BurgWashington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API