Legal Opinion

Wren v. Mangan

California Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1891No. 13424PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

When this cause was pending in Department an opinion was prepared by Commissioner Belcher.*275After hearing in Bank, and due consideration of the case, we are satisfied with that opinion, and with the conclusion therein reached. The opinion is as follows:—

“ This action was brought to determine a contest as to the right to purchase from the state a certain half-section of swamp and overflowed land situate in Tulare County. The trial court gave judgment for the plaintiff, from which, and from an order denying him a new trial, the defendant Hyde appeals.
“ The material facts of the case are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garfield v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Tubbs v. WilhoitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Churchill Co. v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Polk v. SleeperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Dewar v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Williamson v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API