Wren v. Mangan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
When this cause was pending in Department an opinion was prepared by Commissioner Belcher.*275After hearing in Bank, and due consideration of the case, we are satisfied with that opinion, and with the conclusion therein reached. The opinion is as follows:—
“ This action was brought to determine a contest as to the right to purchase from the state a certain half-section of swamp and overflowed land situate in Tulare County. The trial court gave judgment for the plaintiff, from which, and from an order denying him a new trial, the defendant Hyde appeals.
“ The material facts of the case are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Garfield v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Tubbs v. WilhoitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Churchill Co. v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Polk v. SleeperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Dewar v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Williamson v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.