Legal Opinion
Thomason v. Nachtrieb
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 6, 1989No. 89-1396PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
James Thomason brings this appeal seeking relief from the district court’s grant of the defendants’ motion for judgment on the *1203pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 12(c). In the district court, Thomason complained of the payment of $23,053 to Elizabeth Nachtrieb in satisfaction of her accrued pension benefits. Thomason alleged that the payment was made in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1106 Prohibited Transaction^, § 1109 Liability for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, § 1104 Fiduciary Duties, or §…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- National Fidelity Life Insurance Co. v. Joan KaraganisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Republic Steel Corporation v. Pennsylvania Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Gutierrez v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Northern Indiana Gun & Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend, Stephen Leucke, Brian R. Hedman, and Karl KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Randall K. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Perkins v. SilversteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Arthur Gallagher v. City of ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.