Legal Opinion
Arthur Gallagher v. City of Clayton
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 8, 2012No. 11-3880PublishedCited by 208 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
Arthur Gallagher sued the City of Clayton, Missouri (City), and several city officials (defendants) in their official capacities under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, challenging a city ordinance prohibiting outdoor smoking on certain public property. Gallagher alleged the ordinance violated both the United States and Missouri Constitutions. After the defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings, the district court 1 dismissed Gallagher’s federal claims as facially implausible and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claim. Gallagher appeals the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by208 opinions
- Silva v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Robert Saterdalen v. James SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- St. Louis Effort For AIDS v. John HuffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Virginia Wolf v. Scott WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Target Training International, Ltd. v. LeeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2014
203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.