Legal Opinion
Berry v. Marchinkowski
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2015No. Case No. 09-CV-4234 (KMK)PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:
Pro se Plaintiff Robert D. Berry (“Plaintiff’ or “Berry”) brings this Action against Defendants Investigator Stanley Marchin-kowski (“Marchinkowski”) and Detective Charles Locke (“Locke”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted him. Before the Court are Marchinkowski’s and Locke’s Motions for Summaiy Judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 126, 135.) For the reasons explained herein, Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment are granted.
I. Background
A. Factual Background
1. Plaintiff’s, Contracting Business
Plaintif…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- I.M. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Cruz v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Ivery v. BaldaufDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Cox v. Village of PleasantvilleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Butler v. HeschDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.