Molek v. W. J. Rainey, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
In this workmen’s compensation case the appellant (claimant below) seeks to recover for injuries sustained as the result of a fall down an embankment shortly after stopping his work at defendant’s mine. The referee disallowed compensation, and his action was affirmed by the board and also by the court below.
The following findings of fact made by the referee succinctly describe the mine property and the manner in which claimant received his injuries: “Third: The plant of the defendant is located along a main state highway near Fredericktown, Penna. On one side of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Feeney v. N. Snellenburg & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Shickley v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Reese v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Morell v. Buffalo & Susquehanna C. & C. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Boscola v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hopwood v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Wolsko v. American Bridge Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Young v. Hamilton Watch Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Fetzer v. MichrinaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Dunphy v. Augustinian College of VillanovaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.