Legal Opinion

Boscola v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1927No. Appeal 30PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Trexler, J..

The defendant company operates at least two coal mines, one being known as No. 3, at which the claimant was employed. The company also owns five rows of houses and a roadway which it maintains, leading from the various houses and furnishing access to and from the same and used by the people generally when they have occasion to visit the persons occupying the houses. At the point on the roadway about 1000 feet from the. tipple of No. 3' mine, there was an abandoned opening out of which there was a flow of water which came upon the roadway and formed ice. At that place, at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Carville v. A. F. Bornot & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Shickley v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Tolan v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Feeney v. N. Snellenburg & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Black v. HermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Molek v. W. J. Rainey, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Griffin v. Industrial Accident FundMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kerwin v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API