Legal Opinion

Fetzer v. Michrina

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1973No. Appeal, No. 646 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Naomi Fetzer (claimant) was employed by Josephine Michrina (employer) to do various jobs about the bar owned by the employer. She usually worked in the kitchen, preparing sandwiches for the customers, and her normal working hours were between 5:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. She had suffered a leg injury which made it difficult for her to walk, and many times after work she stayed overnight with her employer, who *275lived above the bar. The claimant, herself, lived in a building located a short distance down the alley behind the employer’s bar.

It was agreed that on January 31, 1970,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wolsko v. American Bridge Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Young v. Hamilton Watch Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Eberle v. Union Dental Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Hesselman v. Somerset Community HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Bambrick v. Asten Hill Mfg. Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Fashion Hosiery Shops v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Newhouse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Giebel v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API