Legal Opinion
Martin v. Tracy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 23, 1932No. 29,193PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff in his person and in his property in a collision between his auto and the auto of the defendant. There was a verdict for $6,500, which was conditionally reduced to $5,900, and the reduction accepted by the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying his alternatii'e motion for judgment notAvithstanding or a neAV trial.
On November 28, 1930, about half past five or six in the evening, the plaintiff Avas driving his Ford Tudor automobile northerly of St. Peter on state highway No. 5. It was dark. He ran into the rear of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Geisen v. LuceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Bott v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Ayers v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Hagen v. SnowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Johnston v. SelfeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Blacktin v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.