Claim of McQueeney v. Sutphen & Myer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Sutphen & Myer and another from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission, entered in the office of said Commission on the 2d day of November, 1914.
1Opinion of the Court
Kellogg, J.:
The claimant was an employee in the shop or factory of the employers whose business was “polished plate and window glass, jobbers and manufacturers of mirrors and bevelled plates.” The claimant was injured while assisting two coemployees in raising a light of plate glass, eighty-four by ninety-six inches, from the cutting table. The Commission has made him an award, apparently holding that his employment was within group 20 of section 2 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. That group is “Manufacture of glass, glass products, glassware, porcelain or pottery.” Cutting up and bevelling…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
3Cited by11 opinions
- Claim of Collins v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Claim of Humphrey v. Tietjen & Steffin Milk Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Claim of Spratt v. Sweeney & Gray Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Claim of Gleisner v. Gross & HerbenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Volpe v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.