Claim of Gleisner v. Gross & Herbener
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Gross & Herbener and another from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission, entered in the office of said Commission on the 23d day of February, 1915.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
The award made by the State Workmen’s Compensation Commission in favor of Albert Gleisner must be set aside as unsustained by the findings or the evidence.
The claimant met with accident in the course of his daily work for Gross & Herbener, the employer. This firm was in the real estate business, and owned or operated various apartment buildings in the borough of Manhattan, city of Hew York. One of these was Ho. 558 West One Hundred and Fifty-eighth street, in which the claimant sustained the incapacitating mishap for which the Commission awarded him indemnity. Admittedly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claim of Rheinwald v. Builders' Brick & Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Claim of McQueeney v. Sutphen & MyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arizona Eastern Railroad v. MatthewsArizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Pekin Cooperage Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Cannon v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Kramer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Hart v. Sealtest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.