Legal Opinion

Claim of Spratt v. Sweeney & Gray Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1915PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal in each proceeding by the employer, Sweeney & Gray Company, Smith, Angevine & Co., Inc., and Burger & Gohlke, and by the insurance carrier in each case, from awards of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission, entered in the office of said Commission, the award in the first proceeding on the 28th day of October, 1914, and the awards in the other two on the 27th day of October, 1914.

1Opinion of the Court

Kellogg, J.:

The injuries sustained by the employees making these three claims resulted from accidents which occurred in the State of Mew Jersey, except in the case of Valentine {supra), where the accident occurred in the State of Connecticut. The claimants are all residents of this State, where the employers are engaged in business, and where the several contracts of employment were presumably made. All injuries were sustained in the ordinary course of employment. The State Workmen’s Compensation Commission has made • the usual awards of compensation, and the only question presented by these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Winfield v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. Claim of McQueeney v. Sutphen & MyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Matter of Post v. . Burger GohlkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. North Alaska Salmon Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Holland-St. Louis Sugar Co. v. ShralukaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Crane v. Leonard, Crossette & RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Degray v. Miller Bros. Con. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API